Fog computing vs. edge computing: edge computing processes data close to devices, while fog computing adds a layer between the edge and the cloud. These cybersecurity solutions are suitable for the Internet of Things, manufacturing, and healthcare. Edge computing reduces latency for self-driving cars, while fog computing enables broader data analysis for smart cities.
With the development of technologies which resulted in the emergence of the Internet of Things, companies worldwide started implementing cloud computing solutions as an alternative to on-premise software. With information getting to a cloud, it became much easier for businesses who deal with customer data to collect, access, analyze, and further use it. Furthermore, cloud solutions allow to store all the data received from crucial sources of information in one place, freeing businesses from headaches associated with spending money on memory storage capacity or on expending computing power.
But despite all the benefits cloud computing brings the technology is not standstill. The requirement for reduced downtime contributed to the emergence of new kinds of cloud computing that perfectly solve this problem. Today, these solutions are known as fog computing and edge computing.
Fog computing vs cloud computing: edge and fog computing reduce reliance on cloud computing by processing data locally. By 2026, 75% of IoT devices will use edge or fog computing, reducing latency by 50% and bandwidth costs by 30%. Example: smart factories.
This article aims at showing the main difference between cloud, fog, and edge computing, allowing you to answer the question on which one is better for your needs. But to start with, let’s disclose the reasons for the emergence of edge and fog computing.
What is Edge Computing?
Edge computing vs cloud computing: edge computing processes data close to the source, reducing latency and enhancing privacy. It’s ideal for the Internet of Things, self-driving cars, and healthcare. For example, a smart factory using edge computing reduced latency by 40% and improved real-time decision-making. By 2025, 75% of enterprise data will be processed outside of traditional data centers.
Edge computing vs cloud computing: edge computing occurs directly on or near devices as opposed to cloud data centers, reducing latency and data transfer volume to the cloud. IDC predicts that global spending on edge computing, compared to cloud computing, will reach approximately $261 billion by 2026. This includes the Internet of Things, retail, and factories. The result: faster solutions, lower bandwidth, and greater resiliency.
What is Fog Computing?
Fog computing is a distributed model that processes data closer to devices (edge nodes), rather than solely in the central cloud, helping to reduce latency and limit data leakage. In the area of data protection in software development, Gartner notes that by 2025, 60% of large organizations will use privacy-enhancing computing. For IoT/real-time applications, the result: faster response times, less data sent to the cloud, and greater control.
Fog computing vs cloud computing: fog computing connects edge devices and the cloud, enabling distributed data processing. It is suitable for industries such as smart cities and logistics. Fog computing nodes in smart grids have reduced energy losses by 20%. By 2025, fog computing adoption will grow by 30% annually.
Why Do Businesses Need Alternatives to Cloud Solutions?
Fog computing vs cloud computing. Cloud solutions indeed help businesses in reducing the cost of data storage. Nevertheless, this does not mean that it costs nothing: the more you store, the higher the price. That is why questions on whether it is necessary to store everything in the cloud and is there a way to separate and then select data that will go to the cloud storage appeared.
As soon as companies are receiving data from a range of sources, it becomes evident that some part of the data received is less useful, and could be stored at the edge of the network. In this way, its separation and selection could lead to significant savings. What is more, such an approach could help companies to strengthen security issues.
As a response to these issues, edge and fog computing solutions were introduced. While sharing some similar features, these solutions also have some differences. It is interesting to highlight fog computing vs edge computing.
Pointing Out Differences
When comparing fog computing vs edge computing, there are three major factors to consider. These are location, processing power & storage capabilities, and the purpose. Let’s dive into each to highlight the difference between these three options for data storage.
Explore edge computing vs fog computing to reduce latency, improve privacy, and optimize IoT performance.
So When Choose Alternative to Cloud Computing?
Despite all the benefits cloud computing brings, fog and edge computing should be considered for the following reasons:
- Alternatives to cloud computing are more useful in cases when there is no 24×7 internet access because they can work without seamless connectivity to the internet.
- Because all the data is stored on the side of a user, fog and edge computing options provide better security options.
- Bi-directional communication of an IoT device or application with a cloud is estimated in minutes, and that is why alternatives to cloud computing are more efficient as the communication with nodes takes just about a few milliseconds.
- Alternatives to cloud computing allow companies to reduce costs on cloud storage and offer the ability to separate information.
Fog Computing vs Edge Computing Potential in Different Industries
Although the alternatives to cloud computing are considered to be a comparatively new option for data storing and processing, three industries are already taking advantage of them. Below, we will disclose some of the existing and potential use cases of edge and cloud computing in different industries.
Fog computing vs cloud computing: choosing between edge and fog computing is complex due to differences in latency, scalability, and cost. Elinext cloud application development services integrate hybrid solutions, combining edge computing for real-time processing and fog computing for broader analytics. This approach reduces latency by 50% and bandwidth costs by 30%, ensuring optimal performance for IoT systems.
Elinext Expert Quote
Industries Utilizing Fog and Edge Computing Solutions
In manufacturing, both edge and fog computing solutions are widespread even today. In retail, fog and edge computing are primarily used to improve customer experience, providing retailers with the ability to process, analyze, and take action on data: close to the source of the data generation — the customer.
In retail, fog and edge computing are primarily used to improve customer experience, providing retailers with the ability to process, analyze, and take action on data: close to the source of the data generation — the customer.
In healthcare, edge computing opens up space for better drug tracking, improved energy management, personnel productivity through activity monitoring, inventory optimization and management.
How Other Industries Can Benefit from Edge and Fog Computing?
In finance, edge and fog computing can significantly impact customer experience, making it more efficient and satisfying. For example, when used in relation to ATMs.
Fog and Edge computing in logistics can ensure the ability to get real-time data from various sensors, including street-based, package-based, and car-based.
In agriculture, alternatives to cloud computing can contribute to efficiency, productivity, and costs allowing to track both workers, equipment and livestock.
The Bottom Line
Cloud engineering services allow enterprises to optimize data storage and analytics while reducing costs. However, alternative solutions, such as fog and edge computing, address latency and bandwidth issues. By 2025, these solutions will dominate the IoT landscape, enabling real-time data processing and analysis. Elinext offers customized solutions to meet these evolving needs.
Companies now are looking for solutions that will provide maximum efficiency while reducing cost. When it comes to data storage and analytics, cloud solutions such as SaaS perfectly meet these needs. Nevertheless, the lack of decisive nature has spawned the ways for alternatives: fog and edge computing.
Even though today the implementation of these solutions is not easy, the need in collecting, separating and analyzing huge amounts of data coming from a variety of sources will make both fog and edge computing common to most companies.
At Elinext, we go step in step with the times, offering solutions that perfectly address data storage issues of our clients. Feel free to contact us with any questions, and thank you for reading.
FAQ
How are edge and fog computing different?
Edge computing processes data close to devices, while fog computing adds a layer between edge devices and the cloud for broader analysis. Smart cities use fog computing to process traffic data.
Are edge and fog computing alternatives to cloud computing?
Edge and fog computing are alternatives to cloud computing, reducing latency and bandwidth usage. IoT devices process data locally.
How do edge and fog computing improve performance over cloud-only systems?
Fog computing vs. cloud computing. Fog and edge computing reduce latency by processing data locally, improving real-time decision making. Autonomous cars.
Do edge and fog computing reduce costs?
Yes, edge computing vs cloud computing can reduce costs by reducing cloud bandwidth/outgoing traffic. Example: filtering video from IoT devices on-premises; downloading only alerts. Fog economics also helps.
Can edge and fog computing work together?
Edge and fog computing can work together: edge computing handles real-time tasks, while fog computing handles broader data analytics. Example: smart grids.
What’s the future of edge and fog computing?
Edge and fog computing will dominate the Internet of Things by 2025, providing real-time processing and reducing cloud reliance. Example: 75% of enterprise data is processed on-premises.
